JohnGrafNAF.doc
Natl Alliance of POW/MIA Families Newsletter
What Do The Vietnamese Know About POW John Graf...So, We Asked
Again And We Asked Again And Again And Again And Again.... What's In The
Debrief...pages.prodigy.net/lynnpowmia/naf1.htm
"On
"Also on January
31 and February 1, the Defense Intelligence Agency prepared a list of American
POWs not identified on DRV-PRG-PL lists. This list of 82, including 70
servicemen and 12 civilians, is attached. The DIA provided Henry Kissinger with
loss information about 80 of the people on this list of 82. Dr. Kissinger
selected 19 to present to the Vietnamese in
"These same names were on the first list of priority
cases (102 in all) presented in
Two names appearing on the list of 82 were Captain Robert White and LCDR John Graf.
![]()
Do I Hear Two - In the March 11th edition of "Bits" we discussed a study published in June 1975, titled "Negotiating with the North Vietnamese: A Military Perspective." The study detailed the operations of the Four Party Joint Military Team (FPJMT).
According to the study, members of the FPJMT, "asked PRG to provide information on a specific MIA when (sic) intelligence sources reported as still being held captive." They weren't asking about John McDonnell although they should have. The POW in question was Navy pilot John Graf and at least some of the intelligence came from a real good source, returned POW Robert White.
On
By now you have all heard that the Defense POW/MIA Office, with the assistance of certain congressional representatives succeeded in attaching an amendment to the 2000 Defense Authorization Act that would keep all POW debriefs classified and under the control of DPMO. The amendment stipulates that any case specific information regarding a POW/MIA must be added that POW/MIA's file. We must depend on DPMO to get that job done.
We are, however, prepared to tell you what Robert White had to say regarding John Graf. The following is a summary of the debriefing of Robert White. It is typed verbatim, with all errors and abbreviations.
"29Mar73 W089 (White) instructed by VC area commander
to tell US authorities Graf had drowned in Feb 72--VC guard corrected commander
by saying date of death was Feb 1970. Date of death- poss 1972 Feb ---- W089 bases his belief that Graf may be dead
solely on info from VC commander on
Based on this information, and perhaps other intelligence, the member of the FPJMT requested information on John Graf. According to the FPJMT Negotiating Chronology, for the period April 1 - Dec 31 1973, the first request came on April 7th, 1973. The chronology is divided into three categories; originating source, response and present status.
The April 7th entry reads:
Origination Source:
"In private, US asked Chief, PRGDEL to provide USDEL with all available
information on the status of LCDR John George Graf, USN, who has been missing
since
Response: Chief, PRGDEL stated he would study available information and inform US later.
Present Status: LCDR Graf's status still unresolved.
So, we asked again, on April 9th. That entry reads:
Originating source: US requests information on status of LCDR Graf.
Response: PRG responded that local PRG authorities had been instructed to provide all available information and that PRG hoped it would have a reply for US soon. PRG also linked overall MIA solution to RVN release of civilian detainees.
Present Status: LCDR Graf's status still unresolved.
So, we asked again, on April 30th. That entry reads:
Originating source: US., in private, again asked PRG for answers to US letters requesting information about the status of LCDR Graf and the location of the graves o f those persons who died in captivity.
Response: PRG reiterated that this information had been requested from local officials and that the answers would be forwarded to USDEL as soon as received.
Present Status: No information has been received.
So, we asked again, on June 5th. That entry reads:
Originating Source: In private, US again requested status of LCDR Graf.
Response: PRG informed US that it had been unsuccessful in getting information about LCDR Graf, but that additional information about DIC's and a visit to their graves may be provided in the future.
Present Status: Status of LCDR Graf still unresolved. No DIC information has been received and no visits to DIC graves have been allowed.
So, we asked again, on June
7th. That entry reads: Originating Source: US sent letter to PRGDEL
requesting status of the search for information about LCDR Graf. US offered
helicopter support to fly PRGDEL officials to
Response: Letter was received without comment
Present Status: No information has been provided.
So, we asked again, on October 3rd. That entry reads:
Originating Source: US submitted memo to PRG reviewing prior requests for information about LCDR Graf and again requested information.
Response: Memo was received without comment.
Present Status: No information has been received.
So, we asked again and we
asked again and again and again and again. Twenty seven years have passed, and we are
still asking. We are amazed anyone can
use the words
![]()
What's In The Debrief That They Don't Want Us To
Know About -- Look as the summary of the White debrief on Graf. Let's see what they don't want us to know.
1 - Graf may very well have been
alive on
One must wonder what information may be contained in the classified portions of the White debrief?
All this sure shoots down the myth of Vietnamese "full cooperation."
Do We Hear Three - McDonnell and Graf.... Do we hear three. You will. Maybe we will get to Desaix Anderson's definition of what isn't a large enough number.
![]()
National Alliance of
Families Eleventh Annual Forum is scheduled for
National
Remember All Contributions Are Tax Deductible.